Legal Opinion
United States v. John L. Warren, Jr., David Defina, Des E. Schick and Thomas A. Warren
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided February 11, 1980No. 75-4368PublishedCited by 87 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOHN R. BROWN, Circuit Judge:
We granted this second rehearing en banc in order to consider policy factors bearing on the use of the concurrent sentence doctrine,1 by which we avoided passing upon the correctness of the defendants’ currency violation convictions and the underlying correctness of our earlier decisions in United States v. Granda, 1978, 565 F.2d 922, and United States v. Schnaiderman, 1978, 568 F.2d 1208. We have carefully considered the arguments set out in the briefs, but conclude that since the full Court agrees with those decisions this case is no longer a vehicle for…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Lambert v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- United States v. FreedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Thomas A. Warren, John L. Warren, Jr., Des. E. Schick and David DefinaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Araceli Cremata GrandaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Samuel Meiler SchnaidermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by87 opinions
- Ratzlaf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carmody v. Rhode Island Conflict of Interest CommissionSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1986
- United States v. Ben Lee Basey, Armando Jose Lopez, and Oscar Quirarte Ponce, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. Constance Haas Meester, Jeanne Sanfratello Tumulty, Robert Haas, Edward Conrad SawyerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Billy W. Gray, Lee Andrew Fennell, Roger Lee Wright, Ronald Cecil Barker and Vance C. DyarCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
82 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.