Legal Opinion
Claim of Paider v. Park East Movers
New York Court of Appeals
Decided April 13, 1967PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtScileppi, J.
These are two workmen’s compensation cases where payment is sought for disabilities allegedly resulting from occupational diseases (Workmen’s Compensation Law, § 3, subd. 2).
Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp. (276 N. Y. 313) establishes the definition of “ occupational disease” as “ one which results from the nature of the employment, and by nature is meant, not those conditions brought about by the failure of the employer to furnish a safe, place to work, but conditions to which all employees of a class are subject, and which produce the disease as a natural incident of a particular…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Matter of Goldberg v. 954 Marcy Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Claim of Detenbeck v. General Motors Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
- Claim of Buckley v. Gallagher Bros. Sand & Gravel Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1950
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mylroie v. GAF Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Zoss v. United Building Centers, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
- Mack v. County of RocklandNew York Court of Appeals · 1988
- Claim of Bates v. Marine Midland BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Chadwick v. Public Service Co. of NMNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.