Legal Opinion

Claim of Buckley v. Gallagher Bros. Sand & Gravel Corp.

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 13, 1950PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

There was no evidence that claimant became disabled as the result of her duties as a telephone operator. The tuberculosis contracted by her while serving as bookkeeper was not an occupational disease within the meaning of subdivision 2 of section 3 of article 1 of the Workmen’s Compensation Law. The disease resulted not as an incident to claimant’s occupation but from the fact that she worked alongside a tubercular coemployee who was also a bookkeeper. It was th,e coemployee and not the occupation which caused the disease. (Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp., 298 N. Y. 285; Matter of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Matter of Harman v. Republic Aviation Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. Claim of Champion v. W. & L. E. GurleyNew York Court of Appeals · 1949

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Claim of Paider v. Park East MoversNew York Court of Appeals · 1967
  2. Board of National Missions of Presbyterian Church v. Alaska Industrial BoardDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1953
  3. Reynolds v. General Motors Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  4. Gilbert Pacific, Inc. v. DonovanDistrict Court, E.D. Louisiana · 1961
  5. Parle v. Henry Boos Dental Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1967

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API