In Re Nicole B.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1DissentRaker, J.
dissenting, joined by BELL, C.J.:
I respectfully dissent. I agree with the well-reasoned opinion of the Court of Special Appeals, Judge Sally Adkins writing for the majority, in which the court held that “the ‘active efforts’ standard [of the ICWA] requires more effort than a ‘reasonable efforts’ standard does [under § 5-525 of the Family Law Article of the Maryland Code].” In re Nicole B., 175 Md.App. 450, 472, 927 A.2d 1194, 1206 (2007).
I disagree with the majority’s decision to avoid answering the certiorari question1 in this case, i.e., whether “reasonable efforts” as used in the Federal…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
- Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.