Legal Opinion · Dissent

In Re Nicole B.

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided July 28, 2009No. 73, September Term, 2007Published

1DissentRaker, J.

dissenting, joined by BELL, C.J.:

I respectfully dissent. I agree with the well-reasoned opinion of the Court of Special Appeals, Judge Sally Adkins writing for the majority, in which the court held that “the ‘active efforts’ standard [of the ICWA] requires more effort than a ‘reasonable efforts’ standard does [under § 5-525 of the Family Law Article of the Maryland Code].” In re Nicole B., 175 Md.App. 450, 472, 927 A.2d 1194, 1206 (2007).

I disagree with the majority’s decision to avoid answering the certiorari question1 in this case, i.e., whether “reasonable efforts” as used in the Federal…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Mississippi Band of Choctaw Indians v. HolyfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Gisriel v. Ocean City Board of Supervisors of ElectionsCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1997
  3. Gluckstern v. SuttonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
  4. E. A. v. State, Division of Family & Youth ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re Adoption/Guardianship No. 10941Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API