Gies v. Broad
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Spokane county, Belt., J., entered October 20, 1904, affirming, on appeal from a justice’s court,- a judgment in favor of a laborer on public work, for time in excess of the period p-re-scribed by ordinance as a day’s work.
1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.
The respondent commenced an action in the justice’s court for Spokane precinct, in Spokane county, to recover a balance of $15.91 claimed to he due him as-wages for services rendered the appellant. He recovered in the justice’s court, and the judgment was affirmed on appeal to the superior court of Spokane county. This appeal is from the judgment of the superior court. From the record it appears that the appellant had a contract with the city of Spokane for the improvement of one of its- streets. By ordinance of that city it is provided that on all work done by contract for the city in the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Holden v. StrattonSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Henry v. County of ThurstonWashington Supreme Court · 1903
- Broad v. WoydtWashington Supreme Court · 1904
3Cited by11 opinions
- Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Norris v. City of LawtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Hall v. CowenWashington Supreme Court · 1908
- Hancock v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 1927
- Malette v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1912
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.