Legal Opinion

Sharon Conant v. Entergy Corporation

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided July 8, 2016No. 2015-218PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtEaton, J.

¶ 1. Employer Entergy Corporation challenges the denial of its request for a credit against future workers’ compensation benefits owed to claimant Sharon Conant. Employer asserts that, given the payments it made to claimant under the terms of a collective bargaining agreement, as well as the retroactive temporary total disability (TTD) payments it was ordered to make, claimant has received more money as wage replacement than she was owed. We agree. We therefore reverse the Commissioner of the Department of Labor’s decision on this point, and remand for a determination of the amount to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Wood v. Fletcher Allen Health CareSupreme Court of Vermont · 1999
  2. Herrera v. Workmen's Compensation Appeals BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Freel v. Foster Forbes Glass Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1983
  4. Claim of Houda v. Niagara Frontier HockeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  5. In re Grievance of VSEASupreme Court of Vermont · 2014

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Sharon Conant v. Entergy CorporationSupreme Court of Vermont · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API