Legal Opinion

Rutherford v. Sherburne Corp.

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided September 4, 1985No. Civ. A. 85-0912PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COHEN, Senior Judge:

This personal injury action is before the Court on a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction made, pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(2), on behalf of the defendant Sherburne Corporation (Sherburne). Alternatively, Sherburne seeks to have this case transferred to the District of Vermont pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). See Schwilm v. Holbrook, 661 F.2d 12, 15 (3d Cir.1981) (transferor court need not have jurisdiction over the defendant in order to grant a § 1404(a) motion). Although the plaintiff opposes both of these motions, she asserts that transfer of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ricoh Co., Ltd. v. Honeywell, Inc.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1993
  2. American Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. MCI Communications Corp.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  3. Giangola v. Walt Disney World Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1990
  4. Weber v. Jolly HotelsDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1997
  5. Sandvik, Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API