Legal Opinion

Cody v. Department of Transportation

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 15, 1983No. 8224SC189PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HILL, Judge.

Plaintiffs brought this action for inverse condemnation against the Department of Transportation (hereinafter referred to as DOT), alleging their store building was damaged by blasting which occurred during construction of the adjacent highway. DOT subsequently filed two pleadings: an answer and crossclaim that were served on plaintiffs; and a third-party complaint that was served on Asheville Contracting Company and Travelers Insurance Company, its surety, pursuant to G.S. 1A-1, Rule 14. The third-party complaint sought indemnification for damages for which DOT might be liable to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stanback v. StanbackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Redevelopment Commission of Hendersonville v. HyderCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Cody v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. City of Winston-Salem v. FerrellCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986
  2. Lea Co. v. North Carolina Board of TransportationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989
  3. Bandy v. City of CharlotteCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API