All Star Rent a Car, Inc. v. Wisconsin Department of Transportation

¶ 62. (idissenting). The majority opinion concludes that Wis. Stat. § 227.53(l)(c) (2003-04)1 is ambiguous with regard to whether the Department of Transportation (DOT) was a proper party to serve in a license revocation review proceeding. Majority op., ¶ 27. The majority also concludes that if All Star would have had only the statutes for guidance, its failure to serve the Division of Hearings and Appeals (DHA) might have been understandable. Majority op., ¶ 31. However, the majority then concludes that the DHA's notice to All Star created circumstances in which it was unreasonable for All…