Legal Opinion
Caruso v. Segal (In Re Segal)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided May 3, 1996No. 15-13555PublishedCited by 22 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A INTRODUCTION
In the instant proceeding (“the Proceeding”), MICHAEL A CARUSO, d/b/a OMEGA FOOD INDUSTRIES (“the Plaintiff’), originally challenged our granting a discharge to SAMUEL SEGAL (“the Debtor”) solely on the basis of 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A). The claim set forth in the original Complaint was restricted to aver-ments that the Debtor untruthfully stated that he had not been employed in a family-owned business for the past four years in both his Statement of Financial Affairs and in his testimony before the Interim Trustee, CHRISTINE C. SHUBERT,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- In Re David Louis Cohn, Debtor. Insurance Company of North America v. David Louis CohnCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995
- Desmond v. Varrasso (In Re Varrasso)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1994
- Morris Rosen, Debtor v. Karen E. Bezner, Trustee, Morris RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Bankr. L. Rep. P 76,030 in Re Edsel Adams and Frances T. Adams, Debtors. Barclays/american Business Credit, Inc. v. Edsel Adams and Frances T. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1994
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Casey v. KasalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Spencer v. Blanchard (In Re Blanchard)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Bednarsz v. Brzakala (In Re Brzakala)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
- Carto v. Oakley (In re Oakley)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Casey v. Kasal (In Re Kasal)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.