Legal Opinion
Casey v. Kasal (In Re Kasal)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 1998No. 15-13946PublishedCited by 21 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID A. SCHOLL, Chief Judge.
A INTRODUCTION
The instant decision in the above-captioned proceeding (“the Proceeding”) resolves the merits of a challenge to the Chapter 7 discharge of DANIEL G. KASAL (“the Debt- or”), which we allowed to go forward only as an action pursuant to 11 U.S.C. § 727(a)(4)(A) on behalf of RUTH K. CASEY, TRUSTEE (“the Plaintiff’), and the Debtor’s estranged wife, Marguerite F. Kasal (“the Wife”), in our Opinion of October 21, 1997, now reported at 213 B.R. 922 (“Kasal I ”) We find that the cumulative effect of the Debtor’s failure to disclose (1) any aspects of…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Grogan v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Seymour Chalik, Debtor. Seymour Chalik v. Harold D. Moorefield, Jr., TrusteeCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Associates Commercial Corp. v. RashSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Morris Rosen, Debtor v. Karen E. Bezner, Trustee, Morris RosenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Strominger v. Giquinto (In Re Giquinto)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2008
- In Re ColvinUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2003
- Casey v. KasalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1998
- Smith v. Grondin (In Re Grondin)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 1999
- Church Joint Venture, L.P. v. Blasingame (In re Blasingame)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2016
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.