Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Brayton v. Merriman

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1858PublishedCited by 6 opinions

INFORMATION IN THE NATURE OF A QUO WARRANTO.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Ooivrt,

Cole, J.

This was an information in the nature .of a quo wa/rremto, filed by the Attorney-General, upon the relation of James O. Brayton and Alonzo H. Waldo, citizens of the county of J efferson, to inquire by what right the respondent uses and exercises the office of clerk of the board of supervisors of said county. The respondent in his plea to the information, substantially alleges that prior to the *1520tb day of March, 1856, tlie county of Jefferson was divided into, and composed of, the towns of Aztalan, Cold Spring, Concord, Farmington, Hebron, Ironia, Jefferson, Koshkom-ing,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kane v. ParkerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Carnation Milk Products Co. v. EmeryWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
  2. State v. City of Oak CreekWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Zimmerman v. BrooksCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1904
  4. Perry v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Ripley v. BrownWisconsin Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API