Legal Opinion

Pirkle v. Turner

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 10, 2003No. S03A0961PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Sears, Presiding Justice.

This case involves a property dispute between appellants Richard Pirkle, Matthew Pirkle, Amanda Pirkle, and Madeline Cox and appellee Jimmy Turner. The trial court, among other things, denied the appellants’ motion to dismiss Turner’s counterclaims; granted Turner an interlocutory injunction preventing Cox from taking certain actions with regard to a well, dam, and lake that are located on the disputed property; ruled that two deeds in the appellants’ chain of title contained insufficient descriptions and were therefore void; and ruled that an issue of fact existed on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Crawford v. VernerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  2. Smith v. Georgia Industrial Realty Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  3. Wisener v. GulledgeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1983
  4. Hughes v. HeardSupreme Court of Georgia · 1959
  5. Proctor v. Heirs of JerniganSupreme Court of Georgia · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Pirkle v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
  2. Guaranty Bank & Trust Co. v. LaSalle National Bank Ass'nColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Smith v. TolarCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Strickland v. CMCR INVESTMENTS, LLCSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005
  5. Harpagon Co. v. GelfondSupreme Court of Georgia · 2005

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API