Proctor v. Heirs of Jernigan
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Fletcher, Presiding Justice.
Paul and Jo Proctor brought this quiet title action based on a claim of adverse possession under color of title. This Court granted the discretionary application to address whether actual notice of an adverse possession claim is necessary when there is no evidence of permissive possession. Applying the plain meaning of the statutory language in OCGA § 44-5-161, we hold that the requirement of actual notice applies only to adverse claims based on the claimant’s possession by permission. Because the trial court correctly denied the Proctors’ motion for summary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Georgia Power Co. v. IrvinSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
- Addison v. ReeceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Coleman v. ColemanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
- Johnson v. KeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1931
- Woods v. BrannenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pirkle v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2007
- Church of the Nativity, Inc. v. WhitenerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2001
- Pirkle v. TurnerSupreme Court of Georgia · 2003
- Sherman v. Thomas-Lane American Legion Post 597Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Byrd v. ShelleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.