Legal Opinion

Coombs v. City of Houston

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 20, 1930No. 9609Published

1Opinion

On Motion for Rehearing.

Dismissing the applicability of R. S. art. 5517, by simply saying it “gives a court of equity no power to grant a temporary injunction for the forcible removal of a person in possession of property which might oome under its terms,” appellants, through their able counsel, as the major contention in their motion for rehearing, hark back to their original insistence, notwithstanding such enactment that it was legal lese majeste for them to be deprived of their claimed “continuous, peaceable, and adverse possession ,of the property in controversy for more than thirty-five…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Sumner v. CrawfordTexas Supreme Court · 1897
  2. City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Simms v. ReisnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. State v. GoodnightTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  5. City of Llano v. County of LlanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1893

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API