Legal Opinion

Crolich v. United States

District Court, S.D. Alabama

Decided June 28, 1956No. Civ. A. 1515PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THOMAS, District Judge.

This is an action, pursuant to Section 3772, Internal Revenue Code 1939, 53 Stat. 465, 26 U.S.C.A. § 3772, to recover interest, allegedly overpaid in the amount of $448.86, on a federal income tax deficiency for the year 1946.

Jurisdiction is conferred upon the court by virtue of 28 U.S.C.A. 1346. The cause is before the court on plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment, and has been submitted on briefs. There being no dispute as to any genuine issue of material fact, judgment is rendered pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, 28 U.S.C.A'.

Findings of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Signal Gasoline Corporation v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1942

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Frank Erickson and Amelia Erickson v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1962
  2. Standard Oil Company (New Jersey) v. Denis J. McMahon Individually and as District Director of Internal Revenue, Lower ManhattanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1957
  3. David Ginsburg v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1960
  4. Grimsley v. PattersonDistrict Court, N.D. Alabama · 1957
  5. Silver v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API