Dampman v. Litzau
Court of Appeals of Maryland
September Term, 1970.]
1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.
In these appeals we are presented with a situation wherein, after the appointment of a trustee by a court of equity to sell certain property in lieu of partition (hereinafter referred to as the partition suit), Maryland Code (1966 Repl. Vol.), Art. 16, § 154, the purchasers of the same property at a previous tax sale continued their efforts to foreclose the right of redemption in the property, asserting a paramount claim of right over the parties to the partition suit. Code (1969 Repl. Vol.), Art. 81, § 97, et seq. Macgill, C. J., in the court below, among other findings, held that upon the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thomas v. KolkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
- County Commissioners v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
- Blakistone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
- Hebb v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
- Kaylor v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Scheve v. Shudder, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
- Voge v. OlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
- Quillens v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
- Ivy Hill Ass'n v. KluckhuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
- LaValley v. Rock Point Aero Sport Club, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.