Legal Opinion

Dampman v. Litzau

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 4, 1971No. [No. 302, September Term, 1970.] [No. 303, September Term, 1970.]PublishedCited by 9 opinions

September Term, 1970.]

1Opinion of the CourtFinan, J.

In these appeals we are presented with a situation wherein, after the appointment of a trustee by a court of equity to sell certain property in lieu of partition (hereinafter referred to as the partition suit), Maryland Code (1966 Repl. Vol.), Art. 16, § 154, the purchasers of the same property at a previous tax sale continued their efforts to foreclose the right of redemption in the property, asserting a paramount claim of right over the parties to the partition suit. Code (1969 Repl. Vol.), Art. 81, § 97, et seq. Macgill, C. J., in the court below, among other findings, held that upon the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thomas v. KolkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1950
  2. County Commissioners v. ClarkeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1872
  3. Blakistone v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1912
  4. Hebb v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1886
  5. Kaylor v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1971

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Scheve v. Shudder, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1992
  2. Voge v. OlinCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1986
  3. Quillens v. MooreCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  4. Ivy Hill Ass'n v. KluckhuhnCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1984
  5. LaValley v. Rock Point Aero Sport Club, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API