Pfeiffer v. HIMAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO TRANSFER VENUE
[Motion filed on October 24, 2007]
DEAN D. PREGERSON, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on Defendant Himax Technologies, Inc.’s (“Hi-max”) motion to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a), Plaintiffs’ motion to consolidate related cases. After reviewing the papers filed by the parties and considering the arguments therein, the Court denies the motion to transfer venue to the Southern District of New York.
I. BACKGROUND
This action arises from alleged violations of the Securities Act of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Jones v. GNC Franchising, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Lou v. BelzbergCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. RossCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Hunt Wesson Foods, Inc. v. Supreme Oil CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Metz v. US Life Ins. Co. in City of New YorkDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
- Jackson v. Smedema Trucking, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2008
- Cribier v. Compass, Inc.District Court, S.D. California · 2025
- Cribier v. Compass, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2025
- Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund v. Sea LimitedDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.