Jackson v. Smedema Trucking, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.
The question in this case is an unusual one: does a federal court have authority to impose sanctions on a party under Fed. R.Civ.P. 11 in a case that has been proceeding before a federal agency and has been referred to the court by an administrative law judge under a federal regulation for the sole purpose of imposing sanctions? I conclude that the answer is no. By itself, a federal regulation cannot pro vide a court with a basis for jurisdiction. Even if it could, the regulation at issues in this case, 29 C.F.R. § 18.29(b), does not apply to…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Chao v. Local 743, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
- Pfeiffer v. HIMAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2008
3Cited by1 opinion
- Optimal Markets, Inc. v. SalantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013