Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Smedema Trucking, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided March 12, 2008No. 3:08-cr-00094PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

BARBARA B. CRABB, District Judge.

The question in this case is an unusual one: does a federal court have authority to impose sanctions on a party under Fed. R.Civ.P. 11 in a case that has been proceeding before a federal agency and has been referred to the court by an administrative law judge under a federal regulation for the sole purpose of imposing sanctions? I conclude that the answer is no. By itself, a federal regulation cannot pro vide a court with a basis for jurisdiction. Even if it could, the regulation at issues in this case, 29 C.F.R. § 18.29(b), does not apply to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Stoneridge Investment Partners, LLC v. Scientific-Atlanta, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
  2. Chao v. Local 743, International Brotherhood of TeamstersCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Pfeiffer v. HIMAX TECHNOLOGIES, INC.District Court, C.D. California · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Optimal Markets, Inc. v. SalantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API