Legal Opinion
Gair v. Peck
New York Supreme Court
Decided June 14, 1957PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarold A. Stevens, J.
This is a motion by plaintiffs for summary judgment pursuant to subdivision 9 of rule 113 of the Buies of Civil Practice. Though the defendants did not file a cross motion we may, under the rules, award judgment dismissing the complaint on the merits if we deem it warranted.
The plaintiffs contend that the defendants “were and are without power to promulgate or enforce Buie 4 of the Special Bules Begulating the Conduct of Attorneys and Counselors-At-Law in the First Judicial Department (hereinafter referred to as * Buie 4 ’) ”.
The plaintiffs in their pleadings contend that there is no…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Karlin v. CulkinNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
- Lawrence Constr. Corp. v. State of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Morehouse v. . Brooklyn Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
- Greenberg v. Jerome H. Remick & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- In Re Joint E. & S. Dist. Asbestos LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1995
- Findley v. FaliseDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- In re WeissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
- Public Service Mutual Insurance v. MurtaghNew York Supreme Court · 1958