Legal Opinion

Lagalo v. Allied Corp.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 19, 1998No. Docket 107996PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Per curiam

After being injured in an automobile accident, the plaintiff filed suit in circuit court. A jury awarded damages, finding that the plaintiff had proven one theory of liability but not another. The Court of Appeals vacated the circuit court judgment on the ground that the jury’s findings were inconsistent. We reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals and remand the case for consideration of the other issues raised on appeal.

i

On October 21, 1985, plaintiff Arthur Lagalo was driving his 1982 diesel Chevette when he noticed a brightly illuminated dashboard warning light, indicating a brake…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Gallick v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Prentis v. Yale Manufacturing Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Smith v. E R Squibb & Sons, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Gregory v. Cincinnati Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Manzoni v. Detroit Coca-Cola Bottling Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. People v. TombsMichigan Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Kelly v. Builders Square, IncMichigan Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Allard v. State Farm InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 2006
  4. Bouverette v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Fleck v. Titan Tire Corp.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2001

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API