Legal Opinion

State v. Small

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided January 19, 1955No. 4373PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtKenison, C. J.

The motion to quash the complaint and warrant is based on the contention that the statute does not apply to the defendant. The statute R. L., c. 170, s. 39, reads as follows: “Sales Prohibited. No licensee, sales agent, nor any other person, shall sell or give away or cause or permit or procure to be sold, delivered or given away any liquor or beverage to a minor, to an habitual drunkard, to an insane person, to a person under the influence of liquor, or to any other person to whom any court, selectman of a town, chief of police, overseer of the poor or the commission shall prohibit sale. In…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Standard Oil Co. v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1909

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Hickingbotham v. BurkeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1995
  3. State v. HodgkissSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1989
  4. Zenian v. District of Columbia Office of Employee AppealsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991
  5. Houck v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API