Koman v. Morrissey
Supreme Court of Missouri
1Opinion of the Court
STOCKARD, Commissioner.
This is an action for the specific performance of an oral contract. Judgment was entered for plaintiff, but the trial court retained jurisdiction for the purpose of an accounting, to receive evidence relative to the value of certain shares of capi*931tal stock, and to enforce specific performance. The judgment and decree entered was declared to be a final judgment for purposes of appeal pursuant to Rule 82.06, V.A.M.R. The notice of appeal was filed prior to January 1, 1972. Appellate jurisdiction is in this court by reason of the amount in dispute. The parties will be…
Also in this document: Per curiam.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Kansas City Stock Yards Co. v. A. Reich & SonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1952
- Miller v. HigginsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1970
- Brooks v. CookseySupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
- Jackson v. TibblingSupreme Court of Missouri · 1958
- Condos v. Associated Transports, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1970
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Worrell v. Multipress, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1989
- Holtmeier v. DayaniMissouri Court of Appeals · 1993
- Crabb v. Mid-American Dairymen, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1987
- Hassanin Aly v. Hanzada Import & Export, etc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2017
- Robert Vigano, Robert Hines, Greers Ferry Builders, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellees/cross v. Wylain, Inc., Defendant-Appellant/crossCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.