Legal Opinion
Biao Yang v. Gonzales
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 31, 2007No. Docket 06-2735-ag, 06-3224-agPublishedCited by 364 opinions
1Per curiam
Recently, the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) set down standards for re viewing determinations that an applicant’s asylum application was frivolous under section 208(d) of the Immigration and Nationality Act (“INA”), 8 U.S.C. §§ 1158(d)(4), (6). In re Y-L- 24 I. & N. Dec. 151, 155 (B.I.A.2007). In the two cases currently before us, consolidated for disposition, the BIA upheld frivolousness determinations before the decision in Y-L- was rendered. We remand these cases in order to give the agency an opportunity, in the first instance, to reconsider its rulings in light of Y-L- and to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. VenturaSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Zhang v. United States Immigration & Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004
- Felix Hilario Secaida-Rosales v. Immigration and Naturalization ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- Xiao Ji Chen v. United States Department of Justice, Attorney General Alberto R. GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Cao He Lin, A/K/A Je Ling Chao v. United States Department of Justice and Attorney General GonzalesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2005
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by364 opinions
- Liu v. Eric H. Holder Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Cinapian v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Kulhawik v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2009
- Niang v. MukaseyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2007
- Kone v. HolderCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010
359 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.