Legal Opinion
Carr v. City of Hillsboro
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 9, 2007No. Civil 06-6060-STPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
HAGGERTY, Chief Judge.
Magistrate Judge Stewart has issued a Findings and Recommendation [75] in this action recommending that plaintiff Michael John Carr’s (“Carr” or “plaintiff’) Motion for Summary Judgment [28] be denied, defendant City of Hillsboro’s (“City”) Motion for Summary Judgment [19] be grant ed, and defendant Hillsboro School District lJ’s (“School District”) Motion for Summary Judgment [27] be granted. Carr filed objections [77] to the Findings and Recommendation, and the matter was then referred to this court.
When a party objects to any portion of the Magistrate’s Findings…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- City of Canton v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Board of the County Commissioners of Bryan County v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Green v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2012
- Ivan Cortes-Rueda v. Steve Sloan, Matthew J. Stearns, Woodburn Police Department, City of Woodburn, and Aaron DeVoeDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Leonid P. Krivolenkov v. Matthew Bigoni, Garrett Grimm, Jason Hubert, Sarah Kerwin, Clackamas County, and City of PortlandDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2025
- Tovar Hernandez Jr. v. Washington CountyDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2022