Legal Opinion
Holman v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 28, 2016No. Civil Action No. 2014-1836PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROSEMARY M. COLLYER, United States District Judge
Raquel Holman, a special education student who is now over the age of 18, complains that the District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS) denied her a free appropriate public education (FAPE) in violation of the Individual with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA), as modified by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 et seq. An Independent Hearing Officer found that DCPS failed to provide Ms. Holman her prescribed specialized instruction for her last year of high school and that DCPS excluded…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- N.W. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- James v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- A.W. v. Tennessee Department of EducationDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2022
- Eley v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2026
- G.L. v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2025
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.