Legal Opinion
Transmarine Corp. v. Fore River Coal Co.
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided October 18, 1928No. 100PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BREWSTER, District Judge.
The Fore River Coal Company chartered the steamship Surieo for two voyages with eoal from Hampton Roads to discharging berth alongside the wharf of the Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Company at Fore River, Quiney, the eoal company to discharge the coal; the charter expressly providing, “Suitable berth and sufficient water guaranteed, both at loading and discharging berths.”
The steamer broke adrift from the wharf at Quincy and was damaged. As a result this libel was filed, wherein it is alleged that the damages were caused by the negligence of the respondent, and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Smith v. BurnettSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
- Aktieselsikabet Fido v. Lloyd BrazilieroCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
- Luckenbach S. S. Co. v. Gano Moore Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1923
- The James T. FurberDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1907
- Lamborn & Co. v. Compania Maritima Del NervionDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Royal Insurance Company of America v. Pier 39 Limited Partnership, Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
- D. M. Picton & Co. v. EastesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1947
- Proleride Transport Systems, Inc. v. Union Carbide Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1980
- James McWilliams Blue Line, Inc. v. Youghiogheny & Ohio Coal Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1937
- City of Detroit v. Wyandotte Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1935
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.