Legal Opinion
Wiederman v. Halpert
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 19, 2017No. AC39274PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSheldon, J.
*785 In this action arising from a real estate investment agreement, the defendants Isaac Halpert and Marsha Halpert 1 appeal from the judgment of the trial court denying their motion to open *1249 the judgment rendered against them following a hearing in damages held after they had been defaulted for failing to appear at a trial management conference. The trial court held a hearing in damages and awarded the plaintiff, Malkie *786 Wiederman, $600,892.58 in compensatory and punitive damages, attorney's fees and costs, on her claims of breach of fiduciary duty, fraud, conversion and bad faith. The…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. GoldingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
- Yanow v. Teal Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Ganim v. Smith & Wesson Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. McClainSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- Sturm v. Harb Development, LLCSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2010
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Wiederman v. HalpertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- Kelly v. KurtzConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Saunders v. BrinerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- Wiederman v. HalpertSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019