Legal Opinion

Jim Skinner Ford, Inc. v. Davis

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided December 14, 2012No. 2110859 and 2110863Published

1Per curiam

Jim Skinner Ford, Inc., and the Department of Industrial Relations (“DIR”) separately appeal from the circuit court’s judgment determining that John H. Davis did not voluntarily quit his employment and that he is entitled to unemployment-compensation benefits. We affirm.

Following the separation of his employment from Jim Skinner Ford, Davis applied with DIR for unemployment-compensation benefits. Davis was granted benefits, and Jim Skinner Ford appealed that decision to DIR’s Hearings and Appeals Division. Jim Skinner Ford asserted that Davis was disqualified from benefits because, it said,…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Melson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1999
  2. Ex Parte New England Mut. Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1995
  3. Department of Ind. Relations v. JacoCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1976
  4. Rogers v. Penske Truck Leasing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2010
  5. Miller v. Associated Gulf Land Corp.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API