Rogers v. Duff
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Santa Barbara County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtSharpstein, J.
The plaintiff states two causes of action in his complaint. Defendant Kitz miller demurred to the complaint, on the grounds that it is uncertain, and ambiguous, because it cannot be ascertained from it whether the action is brought for the sum of $697.69,. or any sum of money, advanced for the use and benefit of defendants, or whether said action is brought to recover for the price of beans sold and delivered by plaintiff to defendants, and for commissions on various articles of farm produce, and for money paid out for defendants’ use.
The demurrer was overruled, and that ruling is one of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Winslow v. GohransenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Himmelman v. HenryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Wise v. BurtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gregory v. GregoryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Basham v. Southern Pacific Co.California Supreme Court · 1917
- Pleasant v. SamuelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
- Cutting Fruit Packing Co. v. CantyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
- Fawcett v. Nampa & Meridian Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1920
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.