Legal Opinion

In Re the Estate of Coan

California Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1901No. S.F. No. 2153PublishedCited by 7 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Monterey County granting letters of administration with the will annexed. N. A. Dorn, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

— At her death, deceased was a resident of Pennsylvania, and left a will, in which she appointed “ Adam Keller, of Carlisle, Pa.,” as executor. This will was duly probated in said state. As shown by the findings in this matter, J. W. Coan was the son and Mrs. Catherine Eubank was the daughter of deceased. Both of them were residents of California, and both entitled to succeed to a portion of the personal estate of said' deceased under the terms of her said will. Said J. W. Coan petitioned for letters of administration with the will annexed on the mother’s estate. Mrs. Eubank also…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of BerginCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Kelsey v. GriffithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Brundage v. Union Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Reed v. ReedIdaho Supreme Court · 1970
  3. Estate of WakefieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Estate of SayersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. In Re the Estate of MeierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API