Legal Opinion
State v. Heppenheimer
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided March 15, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions
On error to the Supreme Court. For opinion of Supreme Court, see 25 Vroom 439.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Van Syckel, J.
The plaintiff in error is a manufacturing corporation, chartered by special act of the legislature of this state (Pamph. L. 1873, p. 971), with a capital stock of $10,000,000 duly issued. The controversy relates to an assessment of $4,212.50 made by the state board of assessors against the company for the year 1891, under the supplement approved March 16th, 1891 (Pamph. L., p. 150), of “An act to provide for the imposition of state taxes upon certain corporations, and for the collection thereof/’ approved April 18th, 1884.
It is called a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- M'culloch v. State of MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1819
- New Jersey v. YardSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- Mount Pleasant Cemetery Co. v. Mayor of NewarkSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1890
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hancock v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1898
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1905
- City of Miami v. Florida Power & Light Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1965
- Society for Establishing Useful Manufactures v. Thayer-MartinSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
- Hancock v. Singer Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1898