Legal Opinion · Dissent

Hancock v. Singer Manufacturing Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided November 14, 1898Published

On error to the Supreme Court.

1DissentDixon, J.

In view of the opinion of this court in Singer Manufacturing Co. v. Heppenheimer, 29 Vroom 633, a vote to reverse the judgment now before us needs explanation, for according to that opinion the judgment should be affirmed. Had the judgment authorized by that, opinion been entered of record, and the record been introduced into this cause by pleading or as evidence, it would have been conclusive of the controversy, since the real parties, the state and the Singer company, and the subject-matter, the effect of the sixth section of the company’s charter, are the same now as then. But as no such…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tennessee v. WhitworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Gordon v. Appeal Tax CourtSupreme Court of the United States · 1845
  3. Chicago, Burlington, & Kansas City Railroad v. GuffeySupreme Court of the United States · 1887
  4. Shelby County v. Union & Planters' BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. Tide Water Pipe Co. v. State Board of AssessorsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API