Legal Opinion
Lillis v. Perez
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided September 4, 1962No. 495PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINOS D. MILLER, Jr., Judge pro tem.
Eugene J. Lillis has appealed from a judgment rejecting his demand in a suit on a promissory note. Suit was originally filed by Lillis against Horace R. Perez and Ed Prendergast, Sr., as makers, and the Succession of Bert W. Clarke, as representative of said Bert W. Clarke, deceased, as endorser of the note. The note sued on was for the principal sum of $22,000.00 dated April 8, 1955, payable 6-months after date, bearing interest at the rate of 8% per *456annum and providing for attorney’s fees in the amount of 10% of the principal and interest due and owing if…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Martin v. SeabaughSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1911
- Nielsen v. Planters Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1935
- Bagneris v. SmootSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Russo v. MulaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Clemons v. Succession of JohnsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1929
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- First Financial LSLA v. First American Bank and Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
- Mobley v. HarrelLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1990
- Domingue v. DickinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1992