Legal Opinion

Nielsen v. Planters Trust & Savings Bank

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided November 4, 1935No. 33572PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

Plaintiff, a payee of a cashier’s check, brought this action against the bank which issued the check to him, to recover the sum of $1,200, the face value thereof, as damages, for illegally paying the 'check to the indorsee, after plaintiff had notified defendant not to honor the check, because it had been negotiated for an illegal consideration, i. e., covering losses sustained in gambling at roulette.

Defendant filed exceptions of no right or cause of action, which were sustained by the district court. Plaintiff appealed and the Court of Appeal, by a divided court, affirmed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Drinkall v. Movius State BankNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. J. E. Burke & Co. v. BuckNevada Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Haller v. Workingmen's Co-operative BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928
  4. Thomas v. First National BankIllinois Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Bagneris v. SmootSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Clark v. ReedLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1960
  2. Leo Syntax Auto Sales, Inc. v. People's Bank & Savings Co.Tuscarawas County Court of Common Pleas · 1965
  3. First Financial LSLA v. First American Bank and Trust Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1986
  4. Russo v. MulaLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Wilson v. SawyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1958

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API