Legal Opinion

United States v. Nathan

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided August 18, 1999No. 98-6262, 98-6264, & 98-6299UnknownCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

BECKER, Chief Judge.

This opinion addresses a number of sentencing issues presented by the consolidated appeal of three defendants: Dennis Nathan, who pled guilty to importing goods into the United States that were not marked with the country of origin in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 545; Victor Lander, who pled guilty to unlawfully introducing merchandise into the United States in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 542; and Electrodyne Systems Corporation, which pled guilty to violating the Arms Export Control Act, 22 U.S.C. § 2778, and making false statements in violation of 18 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. Haines v. Liggett Group Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  3. Braxton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. United States v. Larry KoppCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Robert Joseph Carr, Jr., in No. 93-1376. United States of America v. Walter Orlando Cardona-Usquiano, in No. 93-1383Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. United States v. Dennis Nathan, in No. 98-6262 United States of America v. Victor Aron Lander, in No. 98-6263 United States of America v. Electrodyne Systems Corporation, in No. 98-6299Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1999
  2. Saxe v. State College Area School DistrictDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Potts v. HoltDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API