Legal Opinion
Henzel v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.
District Court, D. Nevada
Decided April 26, 2023No. 2:22-cv-00529Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 7 8 IN RE J&J INVESTMENT Case No. 2:22-cv-00529-GMN-NJK 9 LITIGATION Order 10 [Docket No. 69] 11 12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Wells Fargo’s motion to compel discovery from 13 former plaintiffs. Docket No. 69.1 The former plaintiffs filed a response and a counter-motion to 14 quash the subpoenas. Docket No. 72. Wells Fargo filed a reply. Docket No. 76. The motion is 15 properly resolved without a hearing. See Local Rule 78-1. For the reasons discussed more fully 16 below, the motion to compel discovery is DENIED and the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Crawford-El v. BrittonSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Hallett v. MorganCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Kor Media Group, LLC v. GreenDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2013
- Marlyn Sali v. Corona Regional Medical CenterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.