Legal Opinion
Nakashima v. Board of Education
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided March 15, 2006No. 581-021-0034-4-00; A123878PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, P. J.
This case is before us for the second time. In Montgomery v. Board of Education, 188 Or App 63, 71 P3d 94 (2003), petitioners sought review of a decision of respondent Board of Education (the board) concluding that respondent Oregon School Activities Association (OSAA) did not unlawfully discriminate when it declined to adjust the schedule of the Class 2A Oregon State High School Boys’ and Girls’ Basketball Tournament to ensure that Portland Adventist Academy (PAA) teams would not be scheduled to play on the team members’ sabbath. We determined that ORS 659.850 1 required OSAA to attempt to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Portland General Electric Co. v. Bureau of Labor & IndustriesOregon Supreme Court · 1993
- Trans World Airlines, Inc. v. HardisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Balint v. Carson CityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
- Estate of Thornton v. Caldor, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Nakashima v. Oregon State Board of EducationOregon Supreme Court · 2008
- Nakashima v. Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- State v. SauerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Richardson v. Driver & Motor Vehicle Services DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2007
- State v. SerafinCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.