Legal Opinion

In re the Accounting of Dolan

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided November 7, 1951PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rubensteist, S.

Testatrix bequeathed her residuary estate to five named cousins “ in equal shares, share and share alike.” Two of them predeceased the testatrix and the three survivors claim they are entitled to take as a class and not as tenants in common. It is alleged that the five were brothers and sisters. The testatrix also by separate provisions bequeathed the sum total of $4,500 to six other cousins and by codicil revoked four of the bequests and the other two legatees predeceased testatrix. In none of the testamentary provisions is the stock of the cousins shown, nor is there present…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wright v. . WrightNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
  2. In re the Estate of WeissmannNew York Surrogate's Court · 1930
  3. In Re the Probate of the Will of TrumbleNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
  4. In re the Estate of WatsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1937
  5. In re the Judicial Settlement of the Estate of HawleyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of HumphreyNew York Surrogate's Court · 1957
  2. In re the Estate of WilliamsNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  3. In re the Final Accounting of Lafayette National BankNew York Surrogate's Court · 1961
  4. In re the Accounting of DolanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
  5. In re the Construction of the Will of BickelNew York Surrogate's Court · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API