McClatchey v. State
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.
— Phillip McClatchey wants dismissal of the State’s petition to commit him as a sexually violent predator under RCW 71.09. He challenges the statute on several grounds; but, because he has not yet been tried on the commitment petition, we find his challenge premature.
FACTS
In July 1992, the Pierce County Prosecutor filed a petition to commit McClatchey pursuant to RCW 71.09. A determination was made that probable cause exists to believe that McClatchey is a sexually violent predator, and he was sent to the Special Commitment Center at Monroe for *3evaluation. Although RCW 71.09.050(1) provides…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Osborn v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1996
3Cited by11 opinions
- In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Detention of CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
- In Re Detention of RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- In re RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.