Legal Opinion

McClatchey v. State

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 31, 1997No. 63757-1PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMadsen, J.

— Phillip McClatchey wants dismissal of the State’s petition to commit him as a sexually violent predator under RCW 71.09. He challenges the statute on several grounds; but, because he has not yet been tried on the commitment petition, we find his challenge premature.

FACTS

In July 1992, the Pierce County Prosecutor filed a petition to commit McClatchey pursuant to RCW 71.09. A determination was made that probable cause exists to believe that McClatchey is a sexually violent predator, and he was sent to the Special Commitment Center at Monroe for *3evaluation. Although RCW 71.09.050(1) provides…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Kansas v. HendricksSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  3. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Matter of Personal Restraint of YoungWashington Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Osborn v. Grant CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In re the Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In Re Detention of CampbellWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. In Re Detention of TurayWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. In Re Detention of RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. In re RossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API