County of Hillsborough v. Knight & Wall Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
THOMAS, J.:
In its bill of complaint appellee made an attack on the assessment for taxation of its tangible personal property for the years 1941 and 1942, alleging that the valuation fixed by the assessor far exceeded the “full cash value.” The tax official was said to have materially increased the sum shown in the return and this action on his part was charged to have been willful, discriminatory and deliberate resulting in a burden that was excessive and confiscatory. The answer contained a general denial of those averments of the bill directed to the value set by the assessor.
Before…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of Tampa v. ColganSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Schleman v. Connecticut General Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1942
- San Francisco National Bank v. DodgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Ballerino v. MasonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Florida Sugar Distributors, Inc. v. WoodSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Aeronautical Commun. Eq., Inc. v. Metropolitan Dade Cty.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Osborn v. YeagerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1963
- Dade County v. Miami Herald Publishing CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1973
- Daniel v. Canterbury Towers, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Havill v. GurleyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.