Legal Opinion
State v. LeBlang
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided July 12, 1988No. KA-8660PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PLOTKIN, Judge.
Appellants, Jay LeBlang and his partially-owned corporation, Wonderful World of Video, seek reversal of their convictions by a jury under Louisiana’s obscenity statutes for the rental of adult videocassettes to police officers.
*603Appellants were charged with three counts of violating LSA-R.S. 14:106, relative to obscenity, for distribution of the movies “Sex Boat,” “Irresistible” and “Behind the Green Door,” which were rented or sold to undercover New Orleans Police officers on different occasions.
In 1982, LeBlang had entered an agreement with the district attorney’s office,…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Miller v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hamling v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Rose v. ClarkSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. HaltomNebraska Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. MorganLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- State v. ValdesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1989
- State v. LeBlangSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1989