Legal Opinion
Hargrave v. United States
United States Court of Claims
Decided April 5, 1955No. 48899PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLaRamoke, Judge
Plaintiffs’ petition is filed in two counts; the first count alleging a Lucas Act1 claim, and the second count claiming damages for breach of contract arising from an airport construction project at Enid, Oklahoma.
The second amended petition herein was signed by F. M. Hargrave, d/b/a Hargrave Construction Company, for use and benefit of L. B. Fugitt and Carroll Johnston d/b/a Kanotex Construction Company, and two surety companies. Hargrave has no financial interest in any of the claims made.
*76On March 26,1943, Hargrave entered into a contract with the United States to furnish materials and…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fogarty v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Addison Miller, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947
- Kelly v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Kremer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
- Newport News Shipbuilding & Dry Dock Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1934
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Commerce International Company, Inc. v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Buckley & Co., Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
- Commerce International Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1964
- Seger v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1972
- Marshall v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1958
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.