Legal Opinion

Rochelle v. United States

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided November 15, 1973No. Civ. A. 3-3398 and 3-6146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

WILLIAM M. TAYLOR, Jr., Chief Judge.

These. consolidated suits involve not only identical parties, but also the same essential question: who is entitled to possess an income tax refund of nearly a third of a million dollars. For reasons detailed in the pages that follow, I have decided that the United States acted correctly in setting off the refund against other taxes for which the taxpayer was liable.

The refund 1 on the 1962 Federal income tax of Angus G. Wynne, Jr., and his wife results from a loss carryback from 1964 directly attributable to losses sustained in 1964.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Helvering v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  3. Francis v. McNealSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
  4. Tucker v. OxleySupreme Court of the United States · 1809
  5. Gray v. RolloSupreme Court of the United States · 1874

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Still v. United States (In Re W.L. Jackson Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1985
  2. Montgomery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  3. Danning v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API