Legal Opinion

Danning v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 18, 1976No. Nos. 75-2442, 75-2443PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

*726OPINION

Before CHAMBERS and CHOY, Circuit Judges, and EAST,* Senior District Judge. EAST, Senior District Judge:

The Bankruptcy Judge held that the tax claim of the United States (Government) against the members of a bankrupt partnership was subordinated by 11 U.S.C. § 23(g) to the claims of individual creditors of the individual Bankrupts. The District Court reversed, deciding that the Government was an individual creditor and its tax claim held priority under 11 U.S.C. § 104(a)(4). The Trustee appeals and we reverse.

Jack R. Montgomery and one Carlos Rivera were general co-partners operating…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lewis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Schall v. CamorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
  3. United States v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1946
  4. William J. Rochelle, Jr., Trustee v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
  5. In Re Hurley Mercantile Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1932

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Montgomery v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API