Legal Opinion
Halmos v. Bombardier Aerospace Corp.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided June 2, 2010No. 05-08-00865-CVPublishedCited by 45 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion By
Justice MURPHY.
This appeal involves disputes relating to the purchase and operation of a Learjet 31A aircraft. PAH Co., 1 as the purchaser of a fractional interest in the jet, appeals the judgment entered in favor of Bombardier Aerospace Corporation after a directed verdict against PAH on its breach of contract claims and a jury verdict in favor of BAC on BAC’s breach of contract claims. 2 PAH’s president and owner, Peter A. Halmos, also appeals the trial court’s order striking his individual counterclaim. We conclude the trial court erred in granting the directed verdict…
2Cases cited43 opinions
- City of Keller v. WilsonTexas Supreme Court · 2005
- Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Downer v. Aquamarine Operators, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
- Transportation Insurance Co. v. MorielTexas Supreme Court · 1994
- Coastal Transport Co. v. Crown Central Petroleum Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 2004
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Blackstone Medical, Inc. D/B/A Orthofix Spinal Implants v. Phoenix Surgicals, LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2015
- Hampden Corp. v. Remark, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2011
- Dell R. Cullum v. Dalene M. White and Diamond A. Ranch, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2011
- Matlock Place Apartments, L.P. v. DruceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2012
- In re City of DallasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2014
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.