Legal Opinion
Bissell v. Butterworth
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided July 7, 1922PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBurpee, J.
The sole reason of appeal is the ruling of the court on the demurrer to the specified paragraphs of the special defense. The sufficiency of these paragraphs can be determined only by considering them in connection with'the other parts of that defense, which were not denied, and all of which constitute a single plea of justification. Molineux v. Hurlburt, 79 Conn. 243, 64 Atl. 350. Although the Governor, Treasurer and Attorney-General of the State, as members of the Board of Control, and the Attorney-General as the representative of certain beneficiaries of the trust fund provided by the Act…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kendall v. New-England Carpet Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1840
- Clark v. PlattSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1861
- Molineux v. HurlbutSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
- Schriver v. FrommelCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
3Cited by14 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Rourke v. BarbieriSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Kelly v. DeweySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
- Barlow Brothers Co. v. GagerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1931
- Medomak Canning Co. v. YorkSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1948
- Matter of United Fruit and Produce Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1990
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.