Parker v. State
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
SHANGLER, Judge.
The appeal comes from the denial of a Rule 27.26 motion to set aside sentences on pleas of guilty to two counts of sale of a controlled substance. The motion contends that the pleas were not voluntary and, otherwise, that the sentences constituted multiple punishments for the same offense in violation of the Double Jeopardy Clause of the United States Constitution.
The pleas of guilty were entered to accomplish a bargain for the disposition of seven counts of heroin sale under three separate indictments for a composite term of fifteen years imprisonment. The punishment imposed…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Boykin v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sours v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1980
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- McDaris v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1992
- State v. FosterMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
- Chipman v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Howard v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 1981
- State v. AbramMissouri Court of Appeals · 1982
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.