Legal Opinion

People v. Watts

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 11, 1969No. Crim. No. 3550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhelan, J.

Chester Frederick Watts III (defendant) was found guilty by jury of violations of sections 459, Penal Code (burglary) in the second degree, and 470, Penal Code (uttering a forged check). He admitted two prior convictions of violations of section 470, Penal Code. He appeals from a judgment imposing consecutive sentences.

Contention on Appeal

The sole contention is that defendant was denied the right to a speedy trial guaranteed by the federal Constitution and the Constitution of California (art. I, § 13).

History of the Case

The offenses with which defendant was charged were a burglarious entry…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Klopfer v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Smith v. HooeySupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  3. People v. GodlewskiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
  4. People v. DouglassCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Rost v. Municipal CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Ng v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Ng v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  4. People v. ParkerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2025
  5. People v. WickershamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API