Legal Opinion

Conner v. City of Seattle

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided December 21, 2009No. 62563-2-IPublished

1Opinion of the Court

223 P.3d 1201 (2009)

153 Wash.App. 673

William CONNER and Marilyn Conner, husband and wife, Appellants,

v.

CITY OF SEATTLE, a Washington municipal corporation, Respondent.

No. 62563-2-I.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1.

December 21, 2009.

George Richard Hill, McCullough Hill, PS, Seattle, WA, for Appellants.

Judith B. Barbour, Seattle City Attorneys Office, Seattle, WA, for Respondent.

Brian Trevor Hodges, Pacific Legal Foundation, Bellevue, WA, Nicholas Gieseler, Pacific Legal Foundation, Stuart, FL, for Amicus Curiae Pacific Legal Foundation.

Julia Miller, Elizabeth S. Merritt, National…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Department of Ecology v. Campbell & Gwinn, L.L.C.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State, Dept. of Ecology v. Campbell & GwinnWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Robinson v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1992

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API